ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Course Patterns of the Marginal Mandibular Branch of the Facial Nerve over the Facial Vessels in Relation to the Inferior Mandibular Border.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve (MMB) is a surgically relevant extracranial branch of cranial nerve VII, vulnerable during submandibular, parotid, and cervicofacial procedures. Its relationship to the facial vessels and the inferior border of the mandible (IBM) is variable and has been studied for more than six decades. This review analyses the course of the MMB as it crosses the facial artery and vein, focusing on its vertical position relative to the IBM, together with branching patterns, fascial relationships, anastomoses, landmarks, injury, and recovery. The MMB usually crosses the facial vessels superficially, but deep passage and looping have been reported. Its vertical position is segment-dependent: posterior to the facial artery, one or more branches may descend below the IBM in approximately 19-39% of cases, whereas anterior to the artery the nerve is almost always above it. A meta-analysis of 1861 hemifaces reported a pooled prevalence of 39% for at least one branch below the IBM. Reported iatrogenic injury rates range from 16% to 47% (largely transient), and recovery is variable, reflecting a richer communicating network than once assumed. The facial artery crossing at the IBM is a practical landmark for locating the MMB. The traditional 2 cm rule does not reliably protect the nerve, which may descend below this level, especially posterior to the vessels and during neck extension. Safer access depends on combined bony and vascular landmarks, subplatysmal dissection, and assessment of branching variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.