ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Laryngeal Anatomy and Morphometry: Foundations for Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Personalized Management of Laryngeal Pathology.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laryngeal pathology requires individualized management because the larynx integrates airway protection, phonation, swallowing, and respiratory function within a compact and highly variable anatomical framework. This narrative review examines how laryngeal anatomy and morphometry support interdisciplinary collaboration and personalized care in oncologic, stenotic, functional, and reconstructive laryngeal disease. Evidence from morphometric studies, CT, MRI, endoscopy, ultrasonography, three-dimensional reconstruction, artificial intelligence, and multidisciplinary clinical workflows was synthesized qualitatively. Key parameters-including vocal fold length, glottic width, thyroid cartilage angle, cricoid diameter, subglottic diameter, anterior commissure thickness, and the status of paraglottic and pre-epiglottic spaces-provide actionable information for diagnosis, T-staging, airway assessment, surgical planning, reconstruction, and functional rehabilitation. Morphometry concretely informs clinical decisions: thyroid cartilage angle guides thyroplasty and phonosurgical planning; subglottic diameter supports stenosis surgery and airway instrumentation; and anterior commissure, conus elasticus, cartilage, and deep-space measurements refine oncologic staging and margin strategy. Technological accelerators, including AI segmentation, radiomics, 3D printing, photogrammetry, and ultrasonography, extend morphometry from static measurement toward predictive modeling and patient-specific simulation. However, implementation remains limited by heterogeneous CT protocols, inconsistent measurement planes, uneven access to advanced technologies, lack of global normative databases, and unresolved ethical issues surrounding AI validation and data governance. This review supports standardizing CT morphometry using parallel vocal fold planes, routinely measuring anterior commissure thickness in T1 glottic cancer, incorporating ultrasonography as a first-line morphometric tool in voice clinics, and validating AI segmentation against population-specific morphometric norms. Laryngeal morphometry should therefore become a routine decision-making framework for precision laryngology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.