ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Corpus Callosum Anomalies: A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal detection of agenesis of the corpus callosum (CC) anomalies is a challenge. Although a correct diagnosis of anomalies of the CC requires direct examination of the CC in the mid-sagittal plane of the foetal brain, the international guidelines on the mid-trimester morphology scan do not recommend such direct examination of the CC in low-risk populations because of the associated technical difficulties. Recently, such routine direct assessment has been recommended by several international experts in a consensus statement. The implementation of such routine direct assessment is not easy given the difficulties encountered in obtaining the mid-sagittal view of the CC. As such, it is the time to revisit the various two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound techniques with a view to improve visualisation of the CC. The aim of this narrative review article is to discuss the use of various prenatal ultrasound screening methods of CC anomalies including standard axial views, more detailed axial views, the mid-sagittal view, the transvaginal approach, and 3D reconstruction. New insights on screening methods, and a pragmatic approach are also shared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.