ReviewNutrients2026
The Gut Microbiome in Pouchitis: A Narrative Review of Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Modulation.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication following restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC), with a cumulative prevalence of up to 50% within the first two years after IPAA surgery. Accumulating evidence implicates gut microbial dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of pouch inflammation, supported by characteristic microbial alterations and the clinical responsiveness of pouchitis to microbiota-directed therapies such as antibiotics and probiotics. This narrative review synthesizes evidence mainly published in the last decade on microbiota alterations in pouchitis, the mechanisms of microbiota-host interactions that may contribute to inflammation, and the clinical evidence linking the gut microbiota to disease development and progression. Therapeutic strategies for modulating the pouch microbiota, including probiotics, prebiotics, dietary interventions, antibiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, are critically evaluated. Finally, future directions in multi-omics profiling, precision microbiome medicine, and next-generation live biotherapeutics are discussed. Overall, current evidence supports antibiotics as the first-line treatment for pouchitis, although it does not restore microbial eubiosis. Among microbiota-targeted interventions, the eight-strain De Simone formulation has the strongest evidence for prevention, whereas faecal microbiota transplantation remains investigational and is not currently supported outside clinical trials. Further research integrating multi-omics and microbiome profiling is needed to better define disease mechanisms and enable personalized microbiome-based approaches to prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.