ReviewNutrients2026
Timing of Parenteral Nutrition in Neonates, Infants, and Children: Current Evidence, Circadian Considerations, and Emerging Directions.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in parenteral nutrition (PN) formulations, the temporal aspects of PN delivery are less defined. This review synthesizes evidence on the optimal timing of PN initiation, duration, and delivery within the 24-h day in pediatric populations. Evidence suggests that the optimal timing of PN initiation varies by age and clinical context. While early PN remains standard practice for very preterm and very low birth weight infants, delaying PN has been associated with improved outcomes in critically ill children. Continuous PN is routinely initiated in neonates and critically ill children to minimize fluid and metabolic fluctuations, whereas cyclic PN is generally used in older infants and children who are clinically stable to allow infusion-free periods and greater mobility. Despite the widespread use of overnight PN infusions in both the hospital and home settings, the clinical implications of aligning PN delivery with endogenous circadian rhythms remain very limited. Future studies should establish optimal temporal strategies for different pediatric populations and determine whether optimizing the timing, infusion pattern, and circadian alignment of PN delivery improves growth, development, metabolic health, and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.