ReviewCells2026
Context-Dependent Roles of Rnd3 in Cancer: Revisiting a Functional Paradox.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rnd3 is an atypical member of the Rho GTPase family whose activity is mainly regulated by expression, localization and protein stability rather than canonical GDP/GTP cycling. In cancer, Rnd3 has been described both as a tumor suppressor and as a tumor-promoting factor, creating an apparent functional paradox. We propose that this paradox is resolved by a mechanistic invariant: Rnd3 exerts a conserved inhibition of RhoA/ROCK1-dependent actomyosin contractility, whose phenotypic output is redirected by context-specific accessory effectors rather than reversed. In this review, we revisit this paradox by integrating evidence from mechanistic studies, tumor models and patient-associated datasets. We propose that Rnd3 should not be interpreted through a binary oncogene/tumor-suppressor framework, but rather as a context-dependent regulator of tumor cell state. In many tumor settings, Rnd3 repression or loss of Rnd3 function favors proliferation, apoptosis resistance and therapy resistance through pathways involving Notch, NF-κB, EGFR/ERK, EZH2-dependent chromatin regulation, m6A-mediated RNA control, microRNAs and chaperone-mediated autophagy. However, in selected contexts, including RTK-driven glioblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma and gastric cancer, Rnd3 may support tumor fitness, migration or invasive plasticity. We therefore propose a functional stratification model in which Rnd3 output depends on the biological process, tumor lineage, pathway activity and mechanical state of the cell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.