ReviewCells2026
Cellular Recovery and Therapeutic Rechallenge After Cancer Therapy-Induced Kidney Injury: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Implications.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer therapy-related acute kidney injury has become an increasingly common challenge as modern treatments prolong survival and increase exposure to potentially nephrotoxic therapies. Decisions regarding therapeutic rechallenge have relied on normalizing serum creatinine and recovering estimated glomerular filtration rate, despite growing evidence that biochemical recovery does not necessarily indicate restoration of kidney integrity or resilience. In this review, we propose biological kidney recovery as a conceptual framework that integrates mechanisms of kidney injury and repair (adaptive and maladaptive) with emerging biomarkers and therapeutic rechallenge. We first summarize the distinct mechanisms of kidney injury induced by platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors, highlighting how these differences influence subsequent repair. We then discuss the cellular and metabolic processes underlying adaptive repair, the transition to maladaptive remodeling, and current approaches for assessing biological recovery through pathology, biomarkers, and multi-omics technologies. Finally, we present a practical framework for individualized therapeutic rechallenge based on an integrated assessment of kidney-, tumor-, and patient-related factors and outline future directions for precision onco-nephrology. By shifting the focus from filtration alone to biological recovery, this framework enables more informed therapeutic rechallenge aimed at preserving both oncologic efficacy and long-term kidney health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.