ReviewCells2026
The Chronic Wound Microbiome: Dynamics and Treatment Response.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic ulcers require prolonged care and carry an increased risk of infection and limb loss. Sequencing studies of diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure ulcers have revealed dynamic, patient-specific microbial communities whose composition varies with local tissue conditions and treatment exposure. This review examines changes in microbial burden and community structure during wound-bed and antimicrobial interventions and their relationships with healing. Observed shifts may contribute to therapeutic effects, reflect direct perturbation of the community, or follow tissue recovery. However, most studies are small, heterogeneous, and uncontrolled, limiting causal inference. No published randomized trial has shown that treatment selection informed by sequencing-based microbial profiling improves wound healing. A central translational challenge is to determine whether baseline microbial features reproducibly predict responses to defined interventions. Progress will therefore require prospective longitudinal studies integrating sequencing with quantitative culture, isolate phenotyping, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, biofilm assays, and standardized clinical data. Such studies should establish whether microbiome profiling adds clinically useful information to conventional wound assessment and microbiological testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.