ArticleCells2026
Repeated Short-Term Intratracheal Exposure to Urban Particulate Matter Has No Apparent Adverse Effects on Female Reproductive Outcomes in Mice.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban particulate matter (UPM) is a major environmental pollutant known to induce systemic inflammation. While its respiratory toxicity is well-documented, the potential vulnerability of the female reproductive system to inhaled UPM remains a critical concern. In this study, we evaluated female reproductive outcomes in a murine model following repeated short-term intratracheal instillation of UPM (40-200 mg/kg) for a month. Our results demonstrate that while UPM exposure induced robust, dose-dependent pulmonary inflammation, characterized by immune cell infiltration (CD45+, F4/80+, and Ly6G+) and upregulation of pro-inflammatory (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.