Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738799›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2026

Aetiology of pelvic neuropathies in women: a narrative review.

Robert de Leeuw, Freek A Groenman, Gernot Hudelist, Emma E Don, Ralph de Vries, Judith Af Huirne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert de LeeuwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-7754
Freek A GroenmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-4829
Gernot HudelistClinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9424-2208
Emma E DonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-8578
Ralph de VriesMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith Af HuirneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-2677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic neuropathy is an under-recognised contributor to chronic pelvic pain in women, yet a structured overview of its identifiable causes has been lacking. In this narrative review we searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to 1 March 2024 for clinical studies describing pelvic neuropathy in women with a defined or inferable aetiology, and synthesised them thematically. We included 306 studies (215 case reports, 53 case series, 24 retrospective and 14 prospective cohort studies) describing 2,413 women. Five recurring aetiological categories emerged: iatrogenic injury (the most frequent), nerve invasion or traction by disease processes (notably endometriosis and tumours), pregnancy- and childbirth-related injury, external trauma, and compression by muscular, vascular, benign or malignant structures. Aetiologies of particular relevance to gynaecological practice included nerve-invasive endometriosis, which characteristically produces cyclical (catamenial) symptoms, and obstetric neuropathies, which are usually self-limiting. Specific neuropathic syndromes-piriformis, May-Thurner, pelvic congestion and Alcock's canal (pudendal) syndrome-were inconsistently defined across studies. Diagnostic strategies and reporting quality varied widely, neuropathy was frequently recognised late, and the evidence base was dominated by case reports and small series; the overall certainty of evidence is therefore low and no randomised controlled trials were identified. Greater awareness of nerve-specific injury mechanisms-particularly endometriosis-related and obstetric neuropathies-together with standardised diagnostic pathways, is needed to improve recognition and outcomes for women with neuropathic pelvic pain.

Indexed as

Endometriosisiatrogenic diseaseneuralgiapelvisperipheral nervous system diseases

Identifiers

PMID42738799
PMCPMC13575366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.