ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Computational Thermodynamic and Kinetic Analysis of Meisenheimer Intermediate Formation in Aromatic Nucleophilic Addition.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meisenheimer intermediates provide entry points to nucleophilic aromatic substitution and dearomative functionalization, but productive substrate-nucleophile combinations remain difficult to identify beyond strongly activated aromatic systems. We used density functional theory to map Meisenheimer intermediate formation for 95 substituted benzene and pyridine substrates with four carbon nucleophiles, corresponding to 380 combinations. The calculated reaction free energies spanned -90.1 to +33.9 kcal/mol. Electrophilicity and nucleophilicity captured broad thermodynamic trends, although neither descriptor predicted individual reaction energies with sufficient accuracy. A reference-centered thermodynamic window selected 84 combinations for transition-state searches; 44 addition transition states were located, with calculated addition barriers of 0.4-11.4 kcal/mol. Reaction free energy did not rank these barriers, showing that explicit kinetic analysis changed the priorities obtained from thermodynamic screening alone. Sequential application of the thermodynamic window and a barrier no higher than that of the experimental reference (8.0 kcal/mol) identified 32 combinations for experimental evaluation. The results define how aromatic scaffold, substitution topology, and nucleophile strength jointly control Meisenheimer intermediate accessibility and provide a focused set of substrate-nucleophile pairs for experimental testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.