ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Improving the Postharvest Storage and Quality of Tomatoes (
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethylene accumulation accelerates the ripening of climacteric fruits and may impair their postharvest quality. This study evaluated biochar produced from spent tea leaves and enclosed in cellulose sachets as a material for reducing ethylene concentration and preserving tomato quality during storage. The biochar was produced by pyrolyzing spent black tea leaves at 400 °C for 10 min. Tomatoes were stored for 18 days at 21 °C in sealed glass chambers containing sachets with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7.5, or 10 g of biochar, with a treatment without biochar serving as the control. After 6, 12, and 18 days, ethylene concentration, microbiological quality, and selected physicochemical and antioxidant properties were evaluated. Biochar reduced ethylene accumulation in a mass-dependent manner, with the most pronounced effects generally observed in the 5-10 g range. The 10 g treatment reduced ethylene concentration by 41.1%, 37.8%, and 40.3% relative to the control after 6, 12, and 18 days, respectively. The lowest counts of aerobic mesophilic microorganisms, yeasts, and molds were generally observed in the 7.5 and 10 g treatments. The application of at least 5 g of biochar most effectively limited firmness loss; after 18 days, firmness ranged from 1.77 to 1.80 kgf in the 5-10 g treatments, compared with 1.00 kgf in the control. Higher biochar masses also favored the retention of titratable acidity, total phenolic content, and antioxidant activity measured using the ABTS and FRAP assays. Overall, the beneficial effects on postharvest storage conditions and tomato quality became more evident with increasing biochar mass, particularly between 5 and 10 g. Sachets containing 7.5-10 g of spent-tea-leaf biochar showed the greatest potential as a simple passive system for controlling ethylene and preserving tomato quality. This approach combines waste valorization with the potential reduction in postharvest losses, supporting circular economy principles and Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG 12).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.