ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Municipal Outsourcing and Animal Welfare Outcomes in Contracted Dog Shelters: A 10-Year Retrospective Policy Evaluation in Korea.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Municipal dog shelters are often grouped as outsourced facilities despite operator differences. We analyzed 33,875 dog admissions and 90 municipality-year observations from 2016 to 2025 across nine Korean municipalities, with three per operator category; operator type was fixed and nested within municipality. Among 32,838 known outcomes, live-release rates were 69.1%, 58.1%, and 40.0%, and euthanasia rates were 14.0%, 22.8%, and 42.5% in corporation-operated, veterinary hospital-operated, and individually operated shelters, respectively. The corporation live-release estimate ranged from 62.6% to 72.0% under alternative classifications of unresolved records. Small-sample cluster-robust comparisons were imprecise: the individually versus corporation-operated euthanasia odds ratio was 4.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.40-56.35), and every operator interval included 1.0. Contextual adjustment yielded odds ratios of 0.97 for both outcomes for veterinary hospital- versus corporation-operated shelters. Among 33,836 admissions with common 180-day follow-up, live-release rates were 59.9%, 53.0%, and 39.8%, and euthanasia rates were 9.1%, 16.7%, and 42.0%; annual odds ratios were 1.05 (0.93-1.19) and 0.90 (0.78-1.05), respectively. Results describe operator-linked municipal systems, not causal effects. Standardized follow-up, complete reporting, capacity monitoring, and larger prospective studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.