ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Visual Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Avian Imc and Its Effect on Target Decoding Performance.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SSA serves as a fundamental mechanism for optimizing sensory processing by selectively reducing neural responses to prevalent stimuli. While well-characterized in mammals, its evolutionary conservation and functional impact in avian species, particularly on neural coding and decoding, remain largely unexplored. Here, we investigated visual SSA in the avian nucleus Imc by simultaneously analyzing LFP spectral power and single-unit spiking activity in pigeons. During exposure to constant-order moving dot stimuli, repeated presentations induced sustained suppression of both low-gamma-band (31-70 Hz) and high-gamma (71-120 Hz) LFP power, which recovered upon novel stimulus introduction. A similar adaptive pattern was observed in spike firing rates. Stimulus-specific indices revealed that over 80% of Imc neurons exhibited SSA in gamma-band LFP energy, compared to 65.6% based on spike rates. To quantify the functional consequence, we employed machine learning decoders to assess the discrimination of moving targets. Prior to adaptation, decoding based on the spike rate achieved up to 81.8% accuracy, outperforming LFP-based decoding. Critically, SSA may impair the encoding of directional information in sustained responses, reducing the decoding accuracy of classifiers using spike rates, LFP features, or their combinations to near-baseline levels. These findings indicate that gamma-band LFP energy in the Imc primarily reflects stimulus salience, whereas spike rates concurrently encode both identity and salience. This study elucidates the differential roles SSA and its effect on multiplexed neural codes, advancing the understanding of invariant visual representation in the avian brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.