ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
An Ultra-Lightweight Fish Detection Model for Real-Time Aquatic Animal Monitoring on Embedded Platforms.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous, non-invasive fish monitoring supports aquatic animal management, biodiversity assessment, and sustainable aquaculture, but embedded deployment requires a careful balance among accuracy, speed, memory, and computation under visually degraded underwater conditions. We developed ULFD-YOLO, an ultra-lightweight detector derived from YOLOv11n through coordinated redesign of the backbone, neck, and detection head. The model combines a custom convolutional MobileNetV4-tiny backbone, a hypergraph-based multi-scale fusion neck, and a lightweight MBConv head with channel attention. Experiments were conducted on Fish-BJ, an in-house dataset of 3402 images covering 21 species-informed aquarium-fish detection categories, and on a deliberately difficult 1180-image WildFish subset after dataset-specific training. On Fish-BJ, ULFD-YOLO achieved 0.960 mAP@0.5 and 0.732 mAP@0.5:0.95 with 1.3 M parameters, 2.6 GFLOPs, and a 3.0 MB model file, reducing parameters and computation by 50.0% and 58.7% relative to YOLOv11n. Bootstrap resampling yielded 95% confidence intervals of 0.946-0.973 and 0.638-0.821 for the two metrics, respectively. The model achieved 0.803 mAP@0.5 on WildFish and 19-24 FPS at 448 × 640 on a Jetson Orin Nano under its 15 W nvpmodel power mode. These results establish a practical accuracy-efficiency trade-off for embedded fish monitoring rather than peak localization accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.