Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738305›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

From the Thoracoscope to the Robot: The Evolving Landscape of Minimally Invasive Pulmonary Surgery.

Raghav Chandra, Amanda Soe, Amartya Dave, Johannes R Kratz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raghav ChandraDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Amanda SoeSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4316-3948
Amartya DaveSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-3346
Johannes R KratzDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection is the main curative option for non-small-cell lung cancer. Pulmonary resections have historically been performed through a highly morbid open thoracotomy. Minimally invasive approaches to pulmonary resection have revolutionized the field with reduced perioperative morbidity, including less postoperative pain, length-of-stay, and complications, while potentially enhancing oncologic outcomes. In its current generation, robotically performed video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (R-VATS) offers numerous advantages over traditional VATS and is increasingly becoming the standard of care. In this review, we highlight the technical and clinical advantages of R-VATS compared to VATS and traditional thoracotomy. We reflect on emerging advancements in the utilization of the minimally invasive platform for single-anesthetic marking and resection of pulmonary nodules, the integration of artificial intelligence and radiomics to augment preoperative planning, and the expanding role of single-incision robotic surgery. Lastly, we discuss the financial considerations of implementing a robotic thoracic platform and identify opportunities to optimize costs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceminimally invasive surgerynon-small-cell lung cancerradiomicsrobotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgerysingle-anesthetic marking and resectionuniportal

Identifiers

PMID42738305
PMCPMC13564856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.