ArticleCancers2026
Personalized Oncology: Organizing Cancer Treatment Around Patient Biology.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical guidelines remain the foundation of evidence-based oncology, translating population-derived evidence into treatment recommendations for defined patient groups. However, patients with rare cancers, complex tumor biology, or treatment-refractory disease may reach a point at which applicable evidence is limited, or guideline-recommended treatment options have been exhausted. We propose Personalized Oncology as a complementary framework for treatment selection in these situations. Rather than asking only which treatments benefited similar patients, Personalized Oncology asks which available treatment is expected to provide the most favorable benefit-risk profile for the individual patient. It does so by integrating population-derived medical evidence with patient-specific biological evidence generated from the individual cancer. Importantly, exhaustion of guideline-recommended treatments does not necessarily mean exhaustion of biologically supported treatment opportunities. The supporting evidence, rationale, alternatives, limitations, and uncertainty are documented to enable transparent clinical decision-making. Neither population-derived evidence nor patient-specific biological evidence determines in advance whether an individual patient will benefit. Treatment response must therefore be systematically monitored and incorporated into subsequent decisions. Personalized Oncology standardizes this process while preserving individualized clinical judgment. Systematic capture of each patient's biology, treatment, and outcome can create a continuous learning framework in which experience from individual patients informs future cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.