Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738288›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Mechanism-Driven Diagnostic Development: A Specimen-Aware Framework Illustrated by Colorectal Cancer and Solid Tumours.

Ian Daniels, Andrew J Page, Daniel Wise

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian DanielsOrigin Sciences and Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6AD, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9114-0812
Andrew J PageOrigin Sciences and Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6AD, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-6062
Daniel WiseOrigin Sciences and Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6AD, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translational oncology has moved rapidly from histopathology and single-analyte biomarkers toward multi-dimensional molecular profiling. Yet many clinically deployed tests still use reductionist biomarker strategies that under-represent cancer complexity. This review examines whether a mechanistic, multi-layered, and specimen-aware approach can improve cancer detection, classification, prognosis, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, and therapeutic selection. Evidence across solid tumours shows that genomic alterations alone incompletely explain tumour state, metastatic behaviour, immune evasion, or therapeutic vulnerability. Integrated genome and transcriptome analyses, proteogenomics, single-cell atlases, fragmentomic, methylation based cell-free DNA assays, metabolomics and microbiome assessments reveal clinically relevant biology that single modality tests cannot determine. Minimally invasive collected specimens can extend access to screening, diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring, but the choice of specimen should be matched to disease biology and analytes that represent mechanisms of oncogenesis. However, translation remains constrained by pre-analytical variability, contamination, differences in tumour shedding behaviour, clonal haematopoiesis, translation of generated models, incomplete external validation and uncertain downstream clinical utility for emerging platforms. This review provides a commentary on the future of cancer diagnostics, the considerations and barriers to clinical translation, the relationship between utility and dimensionality of biomarkers assessed and the emerging rationale towards mechanistically grounded integrated models.

Indexed as

biomarkersbiospecimenscell-free DNAcolorectal cancerearly detectionliquid biopsymechanism-driven diagnosticsmicrobiomeminimal residual diseasemultiomicsprecision medicinetranslational oncology

Identifiers

PMID42738288
PMCPMC13564937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.