ArticleCancers2026
Post-VABB Cavity-Targeted Avidin-Pretargeted [
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesVacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) is widely used for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer but is not considered definitive treatment because microscopic residual disease may persist within or around the biopsy cavity. The ARTHE phase I trial evaluated a cavity-targeted radionuclide strategy based on same-session sequential intralesional administration of avidin followed by [
methodsEighteen women with nonpalpable breast cancer measuring ≤15 mm and a skin-to-cavity distance ≥ 13 mm were treated in three sequential activity-escalation cohorts. The primary objective was to assess acute local and systemic safety, including dose-limiting toxicity. The protocol-specified co-primary objective was to evaluate preliminary antitumor activity, assessed as breast-only pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. Given the phase I single-arm design, pCR was analyzed descriptively. The protocol-specified secondary objective was patient-specific dosimetry. Additional exploratory assessments included post-injection biodistribution and integration with subsequent breast-conserving surgery.
resultsNo dose-limiting toxicities, grade ≥ 3 adverse events, clinically relevant hematologic toxicity, treatment discontinuations, hospitalizations, or treatment-related surgical delays were observed. Local toxicity was limited to grade 1 injection-site pain and/or erythema. Post-injection imaging consistently demonstrated focal intralesional localization without clinically relevant extra-lesional uptake. All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery 4-7 weeks after treatment. No residual tumor cellularity (RTC), from either invasive or in situ carcinoma, was identified in the breast surgical specimen in 5/18 patients (27.8%). However, because diagnostic VABB may have removed part or all of the malignant lesion, the absence of residual carcinoma at surgery cannot be attributed specifically to the radionuclide treatment.
conclusionsThe intralesional avidin-mediated local trapping strategy using [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.