ReviewCancers2026
Patient Selection for Partial Breast Irradiation in the Era of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Omission: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Partial breast irradiation (PBI) and omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are major advances in the de-escalation of locoregional treatment for early-stage breast cancer. These strategies have evolved independently under different clinical assumptions. The randomized trials establishing PBI incorporated pathological axillary staging into patient selection, although the permitted nodal burden varied among studies, whereas contemporary trials have demonstrated that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be safely omitted in carefully selected patients. Consequently, radiation oncologists are increasingly encountering otherwise suitable candidates for PBI who lack pathological nodal information because SLNB has been omitted, creating an important evidence gap. This narrative review examines how pathological nodal staging became embedded within PBI eligibility criteria and whether this long-standing requirement remains justified following the introduction of SLNB omission. We discuss the biological and clinical rationale underlying current patient selection for PBI, the limitations of extrapolating evidence from whole-breast irradiation to PBI, and the potential contribution of modern imaging, tumor biology, molecular profiling, and prediction models for occult nodal disease to individualized risk assessment. Current evidence does not justify routine implementation of PBI following omission of SLNB. Pathological nodal information may be considered as one component of integrated risk assessment rather than an isolated determinant of PBI eligibility. Patients otherwise meeting contemporary radiotherapy omission criteria represent the most appropriate population for prospective evaluation of this combined de-escalation strategy. This review defines the resulting evidence gap and proposes a conceptual framework for future clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.