ReviewCancers2026
Mechanism-Driven Evolution of Fertility-Sparing Treatment and Precision Management of Special Populations in Endometrial Cancer: A Review.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is increasingly diagnosed in patients who have not yet completed childbearing. For carefully selected patients with grade 1 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma confined to the endometrium, fertility-sparing treatment (FST) can preserve reproductive potential but requires rigorous histologic surveillance. In eligible patients, oral progestins and/or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) remain the mainstay of fertility-sparing treatment, with hysteroscopic lesion resection incorporated in selected cases. Obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, abnormalities in glucose metabolism, molecular subtype, and primary or acquired progestin resistance collectively contribute to heterogeneity in treatment response and the risk of recurrence. This narrative review critically integrates current guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective cohorts, and early exploratory evidence to evaluate the biological rationale, clinical positioning, efficacy, safety, and maturity of evidence for progestin-based therapy, metabolic interventions, combined endocrine approaches, molecularly guided strategies, and exploratory immunotherapeutic approaches. We further propose an integrated clinical pathway encompassing candidate selection, molecular assessment, response evaluation, transition to pregnancy, retreatment after recurrence, and timely conversion to definitive surgery. Importantly, this review distinguishes guideline-supported approaches from adjunctive, investigational, and exploratory strategies. Major evidence gaps include inconsistent definitions of treatment response, limited prospective molecularly stratified data, uncertain reproductive safety of emerging systemic therapies, and insufficient long-term data on pregnancy outcomes and offspring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.