ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Processing, Microstructural Evolution and Engineering Performance of High-Entropy Alloys: A Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-entropy alloys (HEAs) and multi-principal-element alloys (MPEAs) provide broad compositional flexibility for regulating phase stability, microstructure, and properties. However, nominal composition and average phase constitution alone are insufficient to describe the actual material state formed during processing and service. This review summarizes the thermodynamic and diffusion-kinetic basis of phase formation and compares five representative fabrication routes, including mechanical alloying, vacuum melting, severe plastic deformation, magnetron sputtering, and additive manufacturing. Particular attention is given to the effects of processing history on grain structure, texture, elemental segregation, defects, phase constitution, and local chemical order. Computational methods and multiscale characterization techniques are also discussed in relation to the identification and interpretation of processing-dependent material states. Current studies indicate that alloys with identical nominal compositions can exhibit different microstructures and properties because of differences in thermal history, strain path, elemental redistribution, defect populations, and post-processing conditions. The review further examines strength and ductility, corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, irradiation tolerance, and catalytic performance, with emphasis on the evolution of microstructure and surface state under service conditions. These results indicate that reliable evaluation of HEAs and MPEAs requires consideration of processing reproducibility, structural heterogeneity, and long-term stability rather than isolated peak properties. This processing-structure-service perspective provides a basis for more reliable comparison, selection, and engineering assessment of HEAs and MPEAs under application-relevant conditions. Future research should focus on reproducible fabrication, integration of computational prediction with experimental validation, multiscale assessment of structural evolution, long-term service performance, scalable processing, and sustainable alloy design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.