Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738237›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Experimental and Numerical Response of Compressed Equal-Leg Steel Angle Members with Different Anchorage Lengths.

Ilona Szewczak, Małgorzata Snela, Jakub Paśnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ilona SzewczakFaculty of Civil Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, 40 Nadbystrzycka Str., 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4953-0104
Małgorzata SnelaFaculty of Civil Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, 40 Nadbystrzycka Str., 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-4965
Jakub PaśnikDepartment of Machine Design and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, 36 Nadbystrzycka Str., 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7247-2072

Funding

Lublin University of Technology FD-20/IL-4/049 and FD-20/IL-4/052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable tests of compressed steel members require appropriate representation of boundary conditions. This study examined the global response of compressed hot-rolled equal-leg steel angle members with three end-fixture configurations. Nine L50 × 50 × 4 specimens were tested with anchorage lengths of 50, 100, and 150 mm. Because increasing anchorage length reduced the unsupported member length, the observed differences reflect the combined effect of both parameters. Displacements and longitudinal strains were measured using Digital Image Correlation and strain gauges, respectively, and the tests were supplemented by finite element analyses. The configurations produced differences in maximum load and global displacement, although maximum load varied non-monotonically with anchorage length. At the investigated load levels, local longitudinal strains were similar, whereas global displacements differed. The K-5 specimens deformed in the direction opposite to the K-10 and K-15 specimens. Baseline numerical analyses reproduced the observed directions for K-10 and K-15, but not K-5. Reversing the sign of the initial imperfection reproduced the K-5 direction, supporting an interpretation involving two branches of the same global buckling mode; however, the cause of branch selection remained unresolved. The results show that end-fixture configuration should be considered when interpreting experimental and numerical assessments of compressed steel angle members.

Indexed as

compression membersend-fixture configurationglobal bucklingsteel angle members

Identifiers

PMID42738237
PMCPMC13567392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.