ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quasi-Static Penetration Resistance of Bio-Inspired Helicoidal Honeycomb Sandwich Panels: Experiments, Simulations, and Damage Mechanisms.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bio-inspired helicoidal laminates can redirect damage under transverse loading, but their response as sandwich face sheets remains unclear because the core changes both deformation and load transfer. This study experimentally and numerically investigated the quasi-static penetration of 73-ply carbon/epoxy laminates and Nomex honeycomb sandwich panels with cross-ply, quasi-isotropic, uniform helicoidal (5°, 10°, and 20°), and hybrid helicoidal layups. A fully ply-resolved model was developed for the monolithic laminates, whereas an eight-sublaminate model with an explicitly represented honeycomb core was used for the sandwich panels. H73(10-5) achieved the highest monolithic-laminate peak load of 5.23 kN, 46.1% above CP73 and 35.5% above QI73. The sandwich panels exhibited two load peaks separated by a core-crushing plateau. S-H73(5-10) produced the highest first peak load of 8.99 kN, while S-H73(10-5) achieved the highest penetration energy of 108.37 J. Experiments, simulations, and fractographic observations showed that the intact core constrained upper-face-sheet bending and promoted localized indentation-assisted punching-shear perforation. The crushed core subsequently transferred load to the lower face sheet, which failed through bending- and membrane-dominated tearing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.