ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Human-Constrained AI-Assisted Identification of Defect-Topology Relations for Mechanical Degradation in Porous Solids: A Discrete-Element Study.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Porosity measures how much material is removed but not how defects interrupt load-bearing paths. We develop a human-constrained, AI-assisted workflow to identify compact topology-degradation relations in a controlled bonded-particle system with 10,040 specimens spanning five pure families and mixtures. Investigators defined the descriptor grammar, admissible information, physical prior, model size, and approval rules; language models proposed and critiqued descriptor concepts; authors curated and implemented the 127-channel bench; deterministic TRAIN-only code selected terms and fitted the ordinary-least-squares relations. On the reused, non-independent reporting benchmark, the six-descriptor representations produced higher scores than the evaluated three-dimensional convolutional network under the matched protocol. Applied without reselection or refitting to 900 porous specimens from three post-freeze packing realizations, the relations achieved prospective numerical R2=0.516 for strength-decay rate and 0.735 for modulus-decay rate, with greater family heterogeneity for strength. Across families, modulus-decay rate was predicted more consistently than strength-decay rate. Together with the exact contrast k=kE+Δk, this predictive asymmetry motivates, but does not establish, a two-stage failure hypothesis. The exponential form remains a compact empirical parameterization rather than an established physical law. All evidence is numerical and confined to the tested YADE/JCFpm setting; validation across numerical configurations and experimental systems remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.