ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mechanical and Moisture Performance of Dense-Graded Cold-Recycled Asphalt with 60% RAP and Cement-Fly Ash Additives.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emulsion-based cold recycling can reduce the demand for virgin aggregate and high-temperature asphalt production, but mixtures with high reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) contents often have limited early strength and moisture resistance. This study evaluated a dense-graded cold-mix system containing 0%, 60%, and 70% RAP, combined with a 2 × 3 additive matrix comprising cement (0.5% and 1.0%) and Class C fly ash (0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%). The 70% RAP blend fell outside the adopted dense-graded envelope, whereas the 60% blend satisfied that envelope and was therefore selected, not claimed as a universal optimum for the additive stage. Hot-mix asphalt was included only as a benchmark. Marshall stability, indirect tensile strength, Marshall quotient, tensile strength ratio, retained Marshall stability, and retained Marshall quotient were measured under the reported laboratory curing and conditioning procedures. Among the tested cold mixtures, the 60% RAP formulation containing 1% cement and 1% fly ash produced the highest measured stability (13.1 kN), dry indirect tensile strength (1.11 MPa), and Marshall quotient (6.89), with retained-property indices of approximately 87%. These short-term results indicate that gradation control and low-dose cementitious additions can improve strength development and moisture retention in the studied emulsion-RAP system. The contribution of the work is an integrated, formulation-level comparison of RAP screening and a cement-fly ash dosage matrix; the findings remain specific to the materials, gradation envelope, curing regime, and screening tests used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.