ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Anisotropic Behavior of 3D-Printed Concrete: Interlayer Bonding, Pore Architecture, Reinforcement Limitations, and Durability Mechanisms.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The structural use of three-dimensional concrete printing remains limited by the directional weakness introduced during extrusion and layer-by-layer deposition. Although 3DPC offers major advantages in formwork elimination, architectural freedom, and automated construction, its printed architecture produces interfaces, pore networks, and reinforcement discontinuities that do not exist in the same form in conventionally cast concrete. This review examines the anisotropic behavior of 3DPC by linking its architectural arrangement, physical interlayer mechanisms, and chemical durability-related processes. The analysis shows that anisotropy develops from the combined effects of filament orientation, interlayer bonding quality, pore morphology, cold-joint formation, mechanical interlocking, hydration continuity, and reinforcement limitations. Weak interlayer regions act not only as preferred paths for crack initiation and propagation under tensile, flexural, shear, and compressive loading, but also as transport channels that accelerate water absorption, chloride ingress, carbonation, sulfate attack, and freeze-thaw deterioration. The review further highlights that fiber, textile, FRP, and discrete reinforcement strategies can reduce some consequences of anisotropy, but their effectiveness depends on whether they bridge the weaker interlayer regions rather than merely reinforcing the filament direction. SEM-based observations confirm that microstructural discontinuities, fiber-matrix debonding, irregular hydration products, and connected pores provide the material-level basis for the directional response of printed concrete. Overall, anisotropy should be treated as a design-critical feature of 3DPC rather than as a secondary defect. Reliable structural application requires coordinated control of mixture rheology, deposition parameters, interlayer timing, curing, toolpath design, and reinforcement layout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.