Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738133›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Physics-Guided Decision-Support Framework for Melt Pool Prediction and Process Stability in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Nitinol.

Sampreet Rangaswamy, Merve Nur Doğu, Camille Rubio, Hengfeng Gu, Abdul Khader Khan, Chong Teng, Inam Ul Ahad, Dermot Brabazon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sampreet RangaswamyI-Form, Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0008-2925-3331
Merve Nur DoğuI-Form, Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland.
Camille RubioDCU Institute for Advanced Processing Technology Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0004-1177-6389
Hengfeng GuAnsys Inc., 6975 Union Park Avenue, Suite 663, Cottonwood Heights, UT 84047, USA.
Abdul Khader KhanAnsys Inc., 6975 Union Park Avenue, Suite 663, Cottonwood Heights, UT 84047, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0476-652X
Chong TengAnsys Inc., 6975 Union Park Avenue, Suite 663, Cottonwood Heights, UT 84047, USA.
Inam Ul AhadI-Form, Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3802-6156
Dermot BrabazonI-Form, Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3214-6381

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S022635/1Science Foundation Ireland 21/RC/10295_P2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powder bed fusion-laser beam (PBF-LB) of nickel-titanium (NiTi) has attracted increasing interest in aerospace, biomedical, and energy applications owing to its shape memory and superelastic properties, combined with the capability to fabricate complex geometries. However, the strong sensitivity of NiTi to thermal history and process variability makes predictive modeling and process parameter selection challenging. In this work, a physics-guided decision-support framework is developed for melt pool prediction and stability assessment during the PBF-LB processing of NiTi. A high-fidelity thermal finite element model incorporating CALPHAD-derived, temperature-dependent material properties was calibrated using a subset of experimental measurements and independently validated against additional experimental melt pool data. The calibrated model demonstrated good agreement with experiments, yielding mean absolute percentage errors of 4.22% and 5.63% for melt pool width and depth, respectively, on the validation dataset. A multi-output random forest surrogate trained on the validated simulation dataset enabled rapid prediction of melt pool geometric features, achieving test-set R2 values exceeding 0.95, together with low MAE and RMSE values, while five-fold cross-validation confirmed robust predictive performance. The proposed framework integrates surrogate predictions with physics-based melt pool stability criteria to rapidly identify physically feasible processing conditions, thereby providing a computationally efficient foundation for future supervisory process control strategies.

Indexed as

CALPHADdigital twinmachine learningNiTipowder bed fusion-laser beamthermal finite element modeling

Identifiers

PMID42738133
PMCPMC13567148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.