ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Physics-Guided Decision-Support Framework for Melt Pool Prediction and Process Stability in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Nitinol.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Powder bed fusion-laser beam (PBF-LB) of nickel-titanium (NiTi) has attracted increasing interest in aerospace, biomedical, and energy applications owing to its shape memory and superelastic properties, combined with the capability to fabricate complex geometries. However, the strong sensitivity of NiTi to thermal history and process variability makes predictive modeling and process parameter selection challenging. In this work, a physics-guided decision-support framework is developed for melt pool prediction and stability assessment during the PBF-LB processing of NiTi. A high-fidelity thermal finite element model incorporating CALPHAD-derived, temperature-dependent material properties was calibrated using a subset of experimental measurements and independently validated against additional experimental melt pool data. The calibrated model demonstrated good agreement with experiments, yielding mean absolute percentage errors of 4.22% and 5.63% for melt pool width and depth, respectively, on the validation dataset. A multi-output random forest surrogate trained on the validated simulation dataset enabled rapid prediction of melt pool geometric features, achieving test-set R2 values exceeding 0.95, together with low MAE and RMSE values, while five-fold cross-validation confirmed robust predictive performance. The proposed framework integrates surrogate predictions with physics-based melt pool stability criteria to rapidly identify physically feasible processing conditions, thereby providing a computationally efficient foundation for future supervisory process control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.