Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738125›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Interface-Controlled Structural Behaviour of 3D Printed Concrete: Lessons from Masonry for Anisotropy, Print-Path Design and Standardisation.

Ali Mardani, Mohammad Hematibahar, Selin Özteber, Qais Abdulrahman Ali Qais, Abbas Abdulhussein Abd Noor, Tesfaldet Hadgembes Gebre, Ahmed Elsheikh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali MardaniDepartment of Civil Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, 16059 Nilufer-Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0326-5015
Mohammad HematibaharDepartment of Architecture, Restoration and Design, RUDN University, Moscow 117198, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0090-5745
Selin ÖzteberDepartment of Civil Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, 16059 Nilufer-Bursa, Türkiye.
Qais Abdulrahman Ali QaisDepartment of Construction Technologies and Structural Materials, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), Moscow 117198, Russia.ORCID 0009-0003-0245-2086
Abbas Abdulhussein Abd NoorCivil Engineering Department, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Al-Muthanna, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-8454-4344
Tesfaldet Hadgembes GebreDepartment of Architecture, Restoration and Design, RUDN University, Moscow 117198, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7168-5786
Ahmed ElsheikhCollege of Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China.

Funding

Bursa Uludağ University Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP) FBG-2025-2550Bursa Uludağ University Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP) FGA-2025-2048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural application of 3D printed concrete (3DPC) is still constrained by the difficulty of qualifying a layered, process-dependent material using standards developed mainly for cast concrete and conventional masonry. This review examines 3DPC through masonry construction to clarify how interface-controlled behaviour should be interpreted, tested and standardised. The comparison is not based on material similarity, but on the shared structural role of joints, interfaces and assemblage-level load transfer. Most previous reviews mainly discuss printability, mixture design, material development or general mechanical performance. This review instead places the printed interface at the centre of structural qualification, using masonry only as a reference for interpreting joint-controlled load transfer. The review shows that compressive strength alone is insufficient for structural qualification, since printed elements may fail through interlayer debonding, direction-dependent cracking, filament instability, reinforcement discontinuity or connection weakness. Flexural, shear, cyclic and seismic responses are particularly sensitive to interlayer quality, loading orientation and print-path geometry. Existing concrete, mortar and masonry standards remain useful references, but require 3DPC-specific reporting and testing. Accordingly, a tiered qualification route is proposed, progressing from fresh-state characterisation to interface-dominated testing and structural-scale validation.

Indexed as

3D printed concreteanisotropyinterlayer bondmasonryprint-path designstandardization

Identifiers

PMID42738125
PMCPMC13567561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.