Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738120›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Tribology of GA and GI Steel Sheets in Forming: Coating-Failure Mechanisms, Evaluation Methods, and Governing Factors.

Tianqi Liu, Mah-E-Rukh Mustafa, Jia Cui, Ruidi Chen, Xing Wei, Biao Ma, Xianglin Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianqi LiuState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0009-0005-4758-8432
Mah-E-Rukh MustafaState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2531-6665
Jia CuiState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Ruidi ChenState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Xing WeiR&D Central Research Institute, Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., 28# Yejin Road, Qingshan, Wuhan 430080, China.
Biao MaState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Xianglin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9274-9315

Funding

Wuhan Iron and Steel Research Institute have no Grant Number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides a critical overview of wear and coating failure in galvanized (GI) and galvannealed (GA) steel-sheet forming. Galvanized (GI) and galvannealed (GA) steel sheets are extensively used in automotive sheet-metal forming because they combine corrosion protection with acceptable formability. However, their zinc-based coatings are highly susceptible to friction- and deformation-induced damage during forming operations, which can lead to coating degradation, surface deterioration, galling, unstable production, and accelerated tool wear. Owing to substantial differences in coating microstructure and mechanical response, GI and GA sheets exhibit distinct tribological behaviors and failure modes under comparable forming conditions. GI coatings, characterized by a softer Zn-rich outer layer, are more prone to smearing, adhesion, and galling, whereas GA coatings, composed of brittle Fe-Zn intermetallic phases, are more susceptible to cracking, flaking, powdering, and debris-induced abrasion. This review provides a critical overview of wear and coating failure in GI and GA steel-sheet forming. First, the intrinsic characteristics of GI and GA coatings are compared in terms of microstructure, surface morphology, and mechanical and tribological properties. Second, widely used laboratory methods for friction and wear evaluation are reviewed, including strip-drawing, twist compression, draw-bead, tensile strip, deep-drawing, and U-channel forming tests, with emphasis on the contact conditions and failure mechanisms they can reveal. Third, the dominant damage mechanisms are discussed, including adhesive wear, abrasive wear, coating fracture, material transfer, and galling. Finally, the effects of tool properties, lubrication, forming parameters, and finite-element simulation on coating failure are critically assessed. The available evidence indicates that coating failure in GI and GA sheets is governed by the coupled interaction among coating microstructure, contact pressure, tool-surface condition, lubrication state, and deformation path. However, current studies remain fragmented, and an integrated understanding of coating-damage evolution under industrially relevant forming conditions is still lacking. Future research should therefore focus on coating-specific tribological models, in situ and multiscale characterization, and coupled experimental-numerical strategies for process optimization while preserving coating integrity.

Indexed as

failure mechanismfriction and weargalvanized (GI) sheetgalvannealed (GA) sheetsheet metal forming

Identifiers

PMID42738120
PMCPMC13567271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.