Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738051›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Small Angle Scattering Techniques on In Situ Adsorption Studies: A Comprehensive Review.

Ramonna I Kosheleva, Maria Tsaroucha, Ioanna Xylouri, Konstantinos Pavlidis, Agni A Moutzouroglou, Theodoros Markopoulos, Athanasios Ch Mitropoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ramonna I KoshelevaHephaestus Lab, Department of Chemistry, Democritus University of Thrace, St. Lucas, 65404 Kavala, Greece.
Maria TsarouchaHephaestus Lab, Department of Chemistry, Democritus University of Thrace, St. Lucas, 65404 Kavala, Greece.
Ioanna XylouriHephaestus Lab, Department of Chemistry, Democritus University of Thrace, St. Lucas, 65404 Kavala, Greece.
Konstantinos PavlidisHephaestus Lab, Department of Chemistry, Democritus University of Thrace, St. Lucas, 65404 Kavala, Greece.ORCID 0009-0002-5928-9438
Agni A MoutzouroglouHephaestus Lab, Department of Chemistry, Democritus University of Thrace, St. Lucas, 65404 Kavala, Greece.
Theodoros MarkopoulosHephaestus Lab, Department of Chemistry, Democritus University of Thrace, St. Lucas, 65404 Kavala, Greece.
Athanasios Ch MitropoulosHephaestus Lab, Department of Chemistry, Democritus University of Thrace, St. Lucas, 65404 Kavala, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ and operando small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering (SAXS and SANS) have become powerful techniques for studying adsorption processes because they provide real-time information that traditional ex situ methods cannot capture. This review examines the use of these techniques in four major material groups: soft matter and polymers, carbon-based materials, biological systems and ceramics. Unlike conventional before-and-after characterization, in situ methods allow researchers to follow structural changes during adsorption as they happen, revealing adsorption kinetics, intermediate states and pore-filling mechanisms. Operando approaches further connect nanoscale structural evolution with overall adsorption performance, leading to deeper mechanistic understanding. Important developments include monitoring structural rearrangements in polymers during adsorption, studying sodium storage mechanisms in hard carbon anodes using combined small- and wide-angle neutron scattering, observing protein conformational changes at hydrated interfaces, and identifying organic functional groups in mesoporous ceramics in real time. SANS contrast variation, especially through hydrogen/deuterium substitution, allows selective visualization of different components in complex systems, while synchrotron SAXS enables kinetic studies with millisecond time resolution. Despite these advantages, several challenges remain, including model-dependent interpretation of scattering data, difficulties in separating real structural changes from contrast-related artifacts, limitations in accessible timescales and the technical complexity of isotopic labeling. Future research is expected to focus on improved contrast methods, machine learning-assisted data analysis, multimodal approaches combining scattering with spectroscopy or microscopy and the application of these techniques to more complex and disordered adsorbents such as activated carbons, coals and bio-based materials. Overall, this review summarizes current methodologies, compares adsorption-related structural changes across different materials and highlights both current limitations and future opportunities for in situ and operando SAS studies in adsorption research.

Indexed as

adsorption kineticsbiological systemscarbon materialscontrast matchingcontrast variationin situ SASoperando SASsmall-angle neutron scatteringsmall-angle X-ray scatteringsoft mattertime-resolved characterization

Identifiers

PMID42738051
PMCPMC13566843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.