Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738049›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning for Structural Steels: Materials Design, Property Prediction, Durability, and Future Directions.

Guomin Wei, Minghe Li, Bo Cui, Wencui Xiu, Asmawan Mohd Sarman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guomin WeiSchool of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1989-3078
Minghe LiSchool of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China.
Bo CuiSchool of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China.
Wencui XiuSchool of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China.
Asmawan Mohd SarmanFaculty of Engineering, University Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9430-9663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) provides new opportunities to model the nonlinear relationships among composition, processing, microstructure, defects, properties, and in-service degradation of structural steels. This structured critical review examines ML applications to materials and process design, microstructural characterization, mechanical-property prediction, corrosion, fire and elevated-temperature performance, fatigue, fracture, and remaining-life assessment. Literature published up to 31 July 2026 was searched primarily through the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. A total of 110 publications were retained based on their relevance to structural steels, transparency of data and modeling procedures, and availability of information on validation or engineering applicability. The reviewed studies show that model suitability depends strongly on data modality, sample independence, feature representation, and validation strategy rather than on algorithm family alone. ML has progressed from property prediction toward process optimization, inverse materials design, environmental degradation assessment, and fatigue- and crack-related prognostics. However, independent cross-manufacturer, cross-laboratory, production-scale, and field validation remains limited, while uncertainty quantification and applicability-domain assessment are still inconsistently reported. These limitations are particularly important for corrosion, fire, fatigue, and remaining-life applications, where internally validated models should not be interpreted as substitutes for established physical models or design provisions. Future research should prioritize standardized multimodal data, physics-informed and uncertainty-aware modeling, prospective validation, and rigorously evaluated closed-loop monitoring and digital-twin frameworks for structural-steel life-cycle management.

Indexed as

inverse materials designmachine learningphysics-informed machine learningservice-life predictionstructural steels

Identifiers

PMID42738049
PMCPMC13566441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.