Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738037›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Theoretical Modeling and Experimental Validation of Contact Pressure in the Solid Rocket Motor Thermal Insulation Winding Process.

Weichao Zhang, Zengxuan Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weichao ZhangState Key Laboratory of High-Performance Precision Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0009-0002-3628-9937
Zengxuan HouState Key Laboratory of High-Performance Precision Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.

Funding

A sub-project of a major science and technology project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the thermal insulation winding process of solid rocket motors, the roller-tape contact pressure is a critical factor determining bonding quality. However, accurately predicting this pressure is challenging due to the complex three-dimensional contact involving a thin, nearly incompressible rubber tape and an elliptical concave press roller. This paper proposes a theoretical model extending the classical elastic foundation model by incorporating correction strategies to account for material incompressibility and geometric confinement. A finite element (FE) model was developed to simulate the contact and verified against Hertz theory. Two key parameters of the theoretical model were calibrated using the FE results and justified through a parametric study on Poisson's ratio and a theoretical analysis of the contact half-width. The theoretical predictions of deformation, contact pressure distribution, and pressing force agree well with the FE results under different applied displacements and mandrel radii without parameter recalibration, demonstrating the model's generality. Experimental validation employing hybrid inverse analysis confirms the model's global accuracy, yielding <11% relative error between the predicted and measured pressing forces. This study establishes a theoretical foundation for pressure control in the winding process and provides insights into contact problems for thin elastic layers with high Poisson's ratios (≥0.45).

Indexed as

contact pressure distributionelastic foundation modelsemi-empirical modelingsolid rocket motorthermal insulation windingthin elastic layer

Identifiers

PMID42738037
PMCPMC13566281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.