ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review of the Effects of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Autogenous Shrinkage of High-Performance Concrete.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autogenous shrinkage is a key factor contributing to early-stage cracking in high-performance concrete (HPC), which significantly affects structural durability and service life. As core components of HPC, supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can significantly improve concrete workability, mechanical properties, and durability, as well as reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking in HPC, by regulating hydration kinetics, pore structure, and microstructural evolution. The primary objective of this review is to elucidate the differential mechanisms by which different active pozzolanic materials regulate the autogenous shrinkage of HPC. This paper elucidates the patterns and mechanisms by which typical SCMs in HPC (such as fly ash, slag, silica fume, limestone powder, and nano-silica) affect the autogenous shrinkage of HPC. It analyzes the influence of key factors-including the type of SCMs, dosage, particle characteristics, water-to-binder (w/b) ratio, and composite blending on the autogenous shrinkage of HPC. Research indicates that highly reactive SCMs (such as silica fume and nano-silica) accelerate the self-drying process and increase autogenous shrinkage, whereas low-reactivity SCMs (such as fly ash) suppress autogenous shrinkage through dilution effects and by prolonging the hydration cycle. The combined use of multiple SCMs can achieve synergistic control of autogenous shrinkage and mechanical properties. Furthermore, this paper reviews existing autogenous shrinkage prediction models that account for the influence of SCMs and outlines future research directions. At the same time, this review identifies the limitations that currently exist in the research: there is a lack of a unified quantitative theoretical framework for the synergistic effects of multicomponent admixtures. The applicability of prediction models under multi-field coupling of temperature, humidity, and corrosive media is limited. And there is insufficient experimental data on the long-term shrinkage behavior of new low-carbon admixtures such as rice husk ash and calcined clay, which requires further dedicated research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.