Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738017›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

From Static Structures to Molecular Dynamics: Emerging Directions in X-Ray and Electron Materials Characterization.

Daisuke Sasaki, Kazuhiro Mio, Yuji C Sasaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daisuke SasakiGraduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8561, Japan.ORCID 0009-0006-1763-663X
Kazuhiro MioAIST-UTokyo Advanced Operando-Measurement Technology Open Innovation Laboratory (OPERANDO-OIL), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Kashiwa 277-0882, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1655-8231
Yuji C SasakiGraduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8561, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3403-237X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural analysis using X-rays and electron beams has long provided the average arrangement of atoms and molecules-that is, "structural information"-with high precision. By contrast, static measurements cannot directly yield dynamic information on how a material changes over time; instead, information on motion is convolved into a single numerical value such as the B-factor (atomic displacement parameter). Taking this limitation as its starting point, this review surveys the recent trend of introducing a time axis into measurements to observe material dynamics directly. First, we outline the technological foundations that have made the transition from static to time-resolved measurement possible. It rests on the dramatic shortening of exposure times, enabled by the increased brilliance of X-ray and electron sources and by advances in detection technology such as direct photon-counting detectors. Next, we survey dynamic measurement techniques, including time-resolved X-ray crystallography, coherent X-ray scattering, neutron scattering, and time-resolved electron microscopy. We also point out the essential limitation that most of them still return ensemble or volume averages. Building on this, we systematically describe diffracted X-ray tracking (DXT), diffracted X-ray blinking (DXB), small-angle X-ray blinking (SAXB), transmitted X-ray blinking (TXB), and electron-beam molecular dynamics (EBMD), which use gold nanocrystals and gold nanoparticles as motion probes. We distinguish throughout between methods that follow individual objects-DXT and EBMD, which yield trajectories of single labeled molecules or single particles-and methods that analyze intensity fluctuations arising from many contributors within one pixel or illuminated volume-DXB, SAXB and TXB. The latter are not single-molecule measurements; rather, they replace a global ensemble average by a spatially localized statistical one, retaining local heterogeneity that a bulk measurement would average away. Finally, we discuss the implementation and prospects of the large-volume data analysis-principal component analysis, Bayesian inference, machine learning, and autonomous measurement-needed to handle the explosively increasing amount of information that the time axis introduces. We close with the outlook that time-resolved measurement incorporating AI and big-data analysis will become established as a new measurement platform that complements and extends conventional static structural analysis.

Indexed as

diffracted X-ray blinking (DXB)diffracted X-ray tracking (DXT)gold nanocrystal probelarge-volume data analysismachine learningsingle-molecule measurementtime-resolved measurementtransmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID42738017
PMCPMC13565790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.