ArticleBiology2026
Automated Classification of Endometrial Pathologies Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hysteroscopy provides direct visualization of the uterine cavity; however, diagnostic outcomes remain highly operator-dependent and subjective. This study aimed to develop an automated deep learning framework based on the ConvNeXt-XLarge architecture, in comparison with an EfficientNetV2 baseline, to objectively classify common uterine pathologies and thereby reduce diagnostic variability. A prospective dataset of 1262 histopathologically confirmed hysteroscopic images was analyzed using an 80:20 training to validation split and a two-stage transfer learning strategy. In addition to the primary multiclass framework, three binary classification models were developed to evaluate pairwise differentiation between the pathologies. The multiclass model achieved an accuracy of 80.5%, a precision of 82.3%, a weighted Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of 94.8%, and a weighted average precision (AP) of 91.6%. In the binary classification tasks, model 1 (fibroids vs. functional polyps) achieved an accuracy of 96.7% and an AUC of 99.8%; model 2 (fibroids vs. hyperplastic polyps) achieved 87.2% accuracy and an AUC of 87.4%; and model 3 (functional vs. hyperplastic polyps) achieved 92.2% accuracy and an AUC of 99.0%. ConvNeXt-XLarge statistically significantly outperformed EfficientNetV2 in the multiclass task in terms of accuracy and AUC, and in model 2 in terms of accuracy, underscoring the added value of the deeper backbone for this hysteroscopic image classification. Overall, these findings demonstrate that deep learning frameworks can accurately automate the classification of hysteroscopic findings. By providing high-precision analysis, these models offer a robust tool to mitigate diagnostic subjectivity and optimize clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.