Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42737857›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Are Basophil Activation Test (BAT) and IgE Levels Useful Tools in Confirming Penicillin Allergy? Novel Diagnostic Approach in Beta-Lactams Hypersensitivity Reactions: A Systematic Review.

Bernadetta Kosztulska, Magdalena Rydzyńska, Magdalena Grześk-Kaczyńska, Tomasz Rosada, Andrzej Kuźmiński, Natalia Ukleja-Sokołowska

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernadetta KosztulskaDepartment and Clinic of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Magdalena RydzyńskaDepartment and Clinic of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Magdalena Grześk-KaczyńskaDepartment and Clinic of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Tomasz RosadaDepartment and Clinic of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5606-0529
Andrzej KuźmińskiDepartment and Clinic of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Natalia Ukleja-SokołowskaDepartment and Clinic of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-8382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 15% of the population in developed countries report a penicillin allergy in their medical history. However, this changes considerably following a comprehensive allergological evaluation. Numerous studies have shown that a true penicillin allergy is confirmed in only about 8% of individuals. Recommended diagnostic protocols are usually complex and time-consuming, as they rely primarily on in vivo diagnostic approaches, such as skin testing and drug provocation tests. To date, there are no clear guidelines regarding the implementation of in vitro tests in diagnostic algorithms for patients with suspected penicillin allergies. Currently available in vitro methods are characterized by limited sensitivity and specificity. On the other hand, they offer the potential to reduce the need for drug provocation testing, which remains the gold standard but carries an inherent risk of inducing clinical reactions. Consequently, researchers continue to explore methodological improvements aimed at enhancing the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of these tests. In this systematic review, we analyze the current possibilities and limitations of the basophil activation test (BAT) and the measurement of specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies, as well as their potential role in the routine diagnostic workup of patients with suspected immediate hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins.

Indexed as

Basophil Degranulation TestBasophilsDrug HypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EPenicillinsHumansSkin TestsImmunoglobulin EPenicillinsallergybasophil activation testBATbeta-lactam allergybeta-lactam allergy delabelingbiomarkers of penicillin allergydrug hypersensitivity reactionsIgEpenicillin allergysIgE

Identifiers

PMID42737857
PMCPMC13565963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.