SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Biological Activity of Plant-Derived Peptides, Hydrolysates and Digests in the Caco-2 Intestinal Epithelial Model: A Systematic Critical Review.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-derived bioactive peptides are widely investigated for their effects on intestinal epithelial function using Caco-2 cells, with reported antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive and antidiabetic activities. However, this literature remains heterogeneous and has rarely addressed whether the tested material corresponds to the actual bioactive species. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review searched PubMed and Scopus for studies on plant-derived peptides, hydrolysates or digests in Caco-2 cells, identifying 34 eligible studies. The material tested in each study was classified a priori as a purified or synthetic single peptide, an ultrafiltration or chromatographic fraction, a whole hydrolysate or gastrointestinal digest, or an intact parent protein used as a comparator, because these forms do not support equivalent structure-activity inference. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN tool, adopted in the absence of an instrument validated for nutritional cell-culture research. For each study, metabolic characterisation of the tested peptide and the physiological relevance of the concentrations used were evaluated. Directionally consistent bioactivity, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive and antidiabetic effects, was observed across most functional domains, although effect magnitude and stress dependence varied considerably. Mass-based concentrations did not uniformly exceed a conservative exploratory luminal benchmark (0.1-1 mg/mL), but upper-range experiments exceeded it by approximately 25-fold in the antioxidant domain, 50-fold in the anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic domains, and 500-fold in the viability domain; in vivo confirmation was available for a single identified metabolite (LTFPG). Because the primary studies did not report effect estimates with measures of precision, the synthesis is qualitative, based on vote counting by direction of effect, and no pooled effect sizes, heterogeneity statistics or certainty ratings were derived. Overall, plant-derived peptides show directionally consistent bioactivity in Caco-2 models, but the evidence rarely identifies the responsible molecular species or confirms physiological attainability. Future work should prioritise metabolic characterisation, exposure-justified concentrations, and multi-omics approaches to clarify underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.