In one paragraphArticle in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
16 authors.
Samat KozhakhmetovLaboratory of Microbiome, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Block S1, Astana Z05H0P9, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9668-0327 Elizaveta VinogradovaLaboratory of Microbiome, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Block S1, Astana Z05H0P9, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0003-1845-2726 Laura ChulenbayevaLaboratory of Microbiome, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Block S1, Astana Z05H0P9, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8691-9485 Alibek KossumovLaboratory of Microbiome, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Block S1, Astana Z05H0P9, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-7827-6697 Artur KovenskiyLaboratory of Microbiome, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Block S1, Astana Z05H0P9, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0001-5608-2469 Nurislam MukhanbetzhanovLaboratory of Microbiome, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Block S1, Astana Z05H0P9, Kazakhstan.
Gulnazym OspankulovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis Avenue, 62, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-4658 Saule SaduakhasovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis Avenue, 62, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9483-5732 Dina KhamitovaRegional Technological Park QazAgroOrganic LLP, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis 62b, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.
Svetlana KamanovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis Avenue, 62, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.
Dana ToimbayevaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis Avenue, 62, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.
Bakhyt ShaimenovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis Avenue, 62, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5472-036X Begzhan KalemsharivDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis Avenue, 62, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8036-9718 Daulet AitmukhanbetovRegional Technological Park QazAgroOrganic LLP, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Zhenis 62b, Astana Z11F9K5, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8178-3080 Almagul KushugulovaLaboratory of Microbiome, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Block S1, Astana Z05H0P9, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-0899 Funding
Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR22883587
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Enteral nutrition (EN) is known to promote mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease, and multi-omics data suggest that the gut microbiome mediates its therapeutic effects. However, the impact of EN and its components on the gut community during recovery from acute epithelial injury remains incompletely understood. We used whole-genome metagenomic sequencing to investigate the effect of an EN formula based on extruded amaranth flour and pea protein on the gut microbiome in a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) rat model of acute colonic injury. Three groups were compared, as follows: an unchallenged control (
Indexed as
ColitisColonEnteral NutritionFermentationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsDextran SulfateDisease Models, AnimalMaleMetagenomicsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDextran Sulfateacute colonic injurydextran sulfate sodium (DSS)enteral nutritiongut microbiomelactateLactobacillalesmetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS)microbiome functional profilingrats
Identifiers
PMID42737764
PMCPMC13566366
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390