Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42737495›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

PhageScout: Protease Cleavage Site Prediction Using an Experimental Substrate Phage Display Motif-Based Approach.

Enoch Yu, Matthew L Holding, Rex Huang, Andrew Chan, Cherie Teney, Colin A Kretz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Enoch YuDepartment of Medicine, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-9233-1870
Matthew L HoldingLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Rex HuangDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Andrew ChanDepartment of Medicine, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada.
Cherie TeneyDepartment of Medicine, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada.
Colin A KretzDepartment of Medicine, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada.

Funding

The Molecular Genetics of Von Willebrand Factor SecretionR01HL172780 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karl C Desch · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
CIHRNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL172780NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of protease cleavage sites is essential for understanding biological regulation and disease mechanisms, yet many predictive approaches rely on annotated substrates and curated databases, limiting performance for poorly characterized proteases. We present PhageScout, a framework for database-independent generation of protease-specific features to predict cleavage sites using de novo experimental substrate phage display screening. We screened a randomized 5-mer phage display library against two neutrophil serine proteases (cathepsin G, elastase). Cleaved peptides generated position weight matrices (PWMs) and peptide enrichment scores to evaluate cleavage-site likelihood across substrate sequences. Sequence-derived scores were integrated with structural features, including accessibility and flexibility, using XGBoost classification models. Performance was benchmarked against annotated cleavage sites from the MEROPS peptidase database as reference data. Phage-derived PWM scores alone captured protease preferences and discriminated cleavage sites from background sites. Without model fitting, PWM scores achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.756 (95%CI: 0.714-0.797) (cathepsin G) and 0.787 (95%CI: 0.753-0.821) (elastase). Combining broad and specific phage-derived scores improved cathepsin G prediction (AUC = 0.783), whereas this improvement was not observed for elastase. Compared to only phage-derived features, XGBoost models integrating phage sequence and structural features provided modest gains for elastase (AUC = 0.775 to 0.806), with phage-derived features ranking among the strongest predictors, but not cathepsin G (AUC = 0.702 to 0.710). Our findings demonstrate that PhageScout can use experimentally derived cleavage signatures to generate protease-specific predictive features and prioritize protease cleavage sites, providing a framework that warrants further validation across diverse proteases and biological contexts.

Indexed as

Cathepsin GComputational BiologyPeptide HydrolasesAmino Acid SequenceHumansPeptide LibraryProteolysisSubstrate SpecificityCathepsin GPeptide HydrolasesPeptide Librarycomputational biologyenzyme specificityproteasesproteomics

Identifiers

PMID42737495
PMCPMC13565973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.