ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Cross-Virus RNA Language Models for Within-Family RNA-RNA Interaction Prediction in SARS-CoV-2 and Porcine Deltacoronavirus.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA large language models (RNA LLMs) show potential for predicting viral RNA-RNA interactions (RRIs), but their ability to transfer between viruses remains unclear. Here, we evaluated three nucleotide language models using vRIC-seq-derived RRI datasets from two members of the Coronaviridae family, SARS-CoV-2 and porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV). We compared within-virus five-fold cross-validation with bidirectional cross-virus testing. DNABERT achieved within-virus AUC values of 0.9595 for PDCoV and 0.9741 for SARS-CoV-2. Under cross-virus transfer, its AUC decreased to 0.8372 when trained on PDCoV and tested on SARS-CoV-2 and to 0.8116 in the reverse direction, with corresponding F1 scores of 0.7847 and 0.7617. RNAErnie retained similar but slightly lower cross-virus discrimination, whereas the Nucleotide Transformer approached random discrimination. These results provide a two-virus proof of concept that sequence-based models can retain partially shared discriminative signals across coronavirus genera. They do not establish functional, tropism-related, or receptor-dependent transferability, and broader evaluation across additional viruses and orthogonal structural validation will be required before application to emerging-virus screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.