ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Integrated Transcriptomic Analyses Identify Four Prognosis-Associated Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the malignant tumors with high incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Given the poor prognosis of patients with HCC, it is crucial to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying HCC development and to evaluate prognostic markers. Differential expression analysis followed by univariate Cox, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression identified four genes (EPO, SOCS2, IL18RAP, and KPNA2), and a Cox-based risk score was evaluated in the TCGA-LIHC cohort and externally in GSE14520 using Kaplan-Meier and time-dependent ROC analyses. Bulk, single-cell, and protein resources provided convergent expression context. Survival machine-learning analysis using observed overall-survival time and censoring status identified Cox-Ridge as the best-performing model in TCGA-LIHC, with more modest performance in GSE14520, and immune profiling revealed risk-group-associated differences in estimated immune and stromal components, immune-cell composition, and immune-checkpoint expression. The oncoPredict/GDSC2 screen highlighted five potential drug candidates for experimental prioritization. Because the drug screen is based on computationally predicted sensitivities, these findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective cohorts and experimental systems before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.