ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Rice Protein-Fortified Gummy: The Physicochemical, Bioactive and Sensory Evaluation.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop functional gummies enriched with protein from fully ripe (RRP) and green (GRP) Khao Dawk Mali 105 rice. Water in the standard formulation was replaced with protein extracts at 20-100% levels. The final protein content was significantly increased with increasing protein substitution, with a maximum of 12.63 g/100 g in the GRP-100 formulation. Higher protein levels generally decreased gel hardness, but a low substitution level (20%) significantly improved desirable textural properties such as springiness and chewiness. Meanwhile, moderate substitution (40%) maintained optimal structural integrity and achieved the best sensory preference within the RRP group. Bioactive evaluations showed GRP-100 possessed the highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents, alongside superior antioxidant capacity (DPPH and FRAP). Furthermore, GRP-100 achieved the highest overall consumer preference score (8.03). Moreover, electronic nose and tongue evaluations revealed that GRP formulations (especially GRP-100) exhibited the most intense and complex aroma profiles. This robust aroma may have contributed to masking bioactive-related bitterness and astringency, creating a balanced flavor that maximized consumer preference. All formulations showed good microbiological stability after 28 days of storage under refrigeration. GRP-100 provided the greatest improvement in protein enrichment, antioxidant capacity and overall consumer acceptance, whereas moderate substitution levels better preserved textural properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.