ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effect of Palletisation and Temperature on Bag-in-Box Wine Packaging Under Simulated Export Conditions.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bag-in-box (BiB) wine packaging is increasingly used for export, but conditions inside palletised units are rarely measured directly. We instrumented 3 L BiB units with in-bag MEMS pressure and temperature sensors during a 20-day static chamber trial using 19 °C and 50 °C set-point chambers, labelled C19 and C50. The set-point labels do not represent measured wine temperatures. A 15-day single-stack verification trial was also run at the C50 set point. In the main trial, the measured in-bag temperature differed strongly from the chamber set point. C50 packages stabilised at 34.2 ± 0.4 °C in the top units and 26.1 ± 0.2 °C in the bottom units, while C19 units remained around 22.8-23.5 °C. In the verification trial, individual sensors reached 45.0-48.8 °C, but no in-bag sensor reached 50 °C. Internal pressure rose after handling and peaked between day 3 + 13 h and day 5 + 19 h. Bottom-position units showed a larger uncorrected peak ΔP than top-position units (adjusted difference: 20.4 mbar; F(1,8) = 9.14;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.