Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42737365›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Non-Destructive Sensing and Intelligent Quality Prediction During Fruit Drying: From Quality Formation to Decision Support.

Kai Zhang, Qingqing Yuan, Tianrui Liu, Roujia Zhang, Lilang Li, Yu Wang, Siyao Liu, Chenguang Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kai ZhangChina Light Industry Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Detection & Processing, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Qingqing YuanChina Light Industry Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Detection & Processing, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Tianrui LiuChina Light Industry Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Detection & Processing, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Roujia ZhangChina Light Industry Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Detection & Processing, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Lilang LiState Key Laboratory of Discovery and Utilization of Functional Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Natural Products Research Center of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550014, China.
Yu WangState Key Laboratory of Discovery and Utilization of Functional Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Natural Products Research Center of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550014, China.
Siyao LiuSchool of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Chenguang ZhouChina Light Industry Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Detection & Processing, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7844-8743

Funding

Guizhou Technical Innovation Center of Cili industrial QKHPTJSZX [2025] 006National Natural Science Foundation of China 32572638Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20250880Science and Technology Projects of Guizhou Province QKHCG [2025] ZD112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruit drying transforms a living, water-rich tissue into a stable food through coupled changes in moisture distribution, structure, color, nutrients, and aroma. Although drying technologies and non-destructive sensing have advanced rapidly, these fields have largely developed in parallel, leaving the relationship between quality formation and measurable process signals insufficiently resolved. Here, physical and chemical changes during drying are connected to the signals that can support quality prediction. Current evidence shows that moisture loss and surface appearance are the most tractable real-time targets. Texture, bioactive retention, and flavor remain less accessible because their signals depend more strongly on internal structure, reference chemistry, or sensory response. Optical, magnetic-resonance, thermal, volatile-sensing, and electrical approaches consequently provide complementary rather than interchangeable views of the product. Multimodal models improve prediction when the added signals resolve different aspects of drying, but redundant inputs can increase complexity without improving transferability. Progress toward intelligent fruit drying therefore depends on matching sensors to the evolving product state, validating models beyond individual batches and instruments, and linking predictions to practical process decisions. This process-quality perspective provides a basis for moving from retrospective quality assessment toward reliable monitoring and controlled drying.

Indexed as

decision supportfruit dryingintelligent predictionnon-destructive sensingprocess analytical technologyquality formation

Identifiers

PMID42737365
PMCPMC13565016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.