ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Non-Destructive Sensing and Intelligent Quality Prediction During Fruit Drying: From Quality Formation to Decision Support.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fruit drying transforms a living, water-rich tissue into a stable food through coupled changes in moisture distribution, structure, color, nutrients, and aroma. Although drying technologies and non-destructive sensing have advanced rapidly, these fields have largely developed in parallel, leaving the relationship between quality formation and measurable process signals insufficiently resolved. Here, physical and chemical changes during drying are connected to the signals that can support quality prediction. Current evidence shows that moisture loss and surface appearance are the most tractable real-time targets. Texture, bioactive retention, and flavor remain less accessible because their signals depend more strongly on internal structure, reference chemistry, or sensory response. Optical, magnetic-resonance, thermal, volatile-sensing, and electrical approaches consequently provide complementary rather than interchangeable views of the product. Multimodal models improve prediction when the added signals resolve different aspects of drying, but redundant inputs can increase complexity without improving transferability. Progress toward intelligent fruit drying therefore depends on matching sensors to the evolving product state, validating models beyond individual batches and instruments, and linking predictions to practical process decisions. This process-quality perspective provides a basis for moving from retrospective quality assessment toward reliable monitoring and controlled drying.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.