ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Nutritional Awareness of Extra Virgin Olive Oil: Empirical Evidence from Consumer Perceptions and Health Beliefs.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) is a key component of the Mediterranean diet and a functional food whose health properties are mainly attributed to phenolic compounds. Despite the availability of EFSA-approved health claims, consumers often rely on heuristic cues that may not correspond to scientifically recognized quality indicators. A cross-sectional online survey involving 516 Italian consumers was conducted to investigate consumption patterns, health-related beliefs, territorial identity, and sensory quality perception. Descriptive analyses, regional comparisons, and a multivariable logistic regression model predicting sensory misperception were performed. Most respondents reported frequent EVOO consumption and willingness to pay a premium for certified products. Territorial identity, trust in local producers, and origin-related cues emerged as important dimensions of quality perception. Although respondents generally recognized the health relevance of antioxidants and unsaturated fatty acids, misconceptions regarding sensory indicators were common. Specifically, 41% of respondents associated sweetness with EVOO quality, whereas bitterness and pungency were less frequently recognized. Greater perceived knowledge of EVOO health properties was associated with a lower likelihood of identifying sweetness as an indicator of EVOO quality. Overall, consumer evaluation of EVOO reflected the interaction of informational, symbolic, and experiential dimensions, highlighting the potential relevance of communication strategies and sensory education initiatives whose effectiveness should be evaluated in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.