ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Consumer Attitudes Towards Health, Nutritional and Environmental Concerns of Beef Consumption by Confronting Different Information.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore markets for fresh beef in Serbia by assessing consumers' attitudes and awareness of three aspects, health, nutrition, and the environment, after being given information. Our working hypothesis was to explore the "halo" and "horn" effects of information about beef production and consumption on consumers. Surveys were carried out with a total sample of 956 beef consumers in order to analyze what they take into account in their buying decisions when they are directly informed. Consciously, we explored three different groups of consumers, consumers conscious about health, nutrition and the environment, which was confirmed after cluster analysis was done. The most numerous groups were customers conscious about health and nutrition, with 39.6% and 35.6% shares of the total number of consumers, respectively. Finally, our results show that consumers value health and environmental information the most, while they were not significantly affected by information about the nutritional benefits of beef.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.