Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42737199›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Recognition of Food Processing and Its Association with Consumption Patterns and Nutrient Intake Among Saudi University Students.

Wajd D Alomari, Noha M Almoraie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wajd D AlomariDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Sciences and Design, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 3270, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0001-2676-723X
Noha M AlmoraieDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Sciences and Design, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 3270, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2212-1255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, food processing and nutrition sciences operated as distinct scientific domains; however, increasing health concerns have highlighted the need for integrated perspectives and practical food classifications. This study aimed to assess participants' knowledge of food processing classification according to the NOVA system and investigate its association with ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption patterns and nutrient intake. A cross-sectional study of 403 healthy students (18-30 years) was conducted. Participants were asked to classify each food according to its level of processing. Dietary intake was assessed in a subsample of 190 participants who completed the 24-h dietary recall assessment and had complete dietary data available. Higher food processing knowledge was associated with lower UPF consumption (B = -0.241, 95% CI: -0.414 to -0.068;

Indexed as

consumer awarenessfood processinghealth habitsNOVA classificationultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID42737199
PMCPMC13564625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.