ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Prediction of Walnut Moisture Content Using Impact Acoustics, Physical Dimensions, and Machine Learning.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Walnuts are commercially important tree nuts whose moisture content (MC) influences quality, shelf life, and post-harvest processing. This study evaluated the potential of low-cost acoustic sensing combined with machine learning for non-destructive MC prediction. Sixty in-shell walnuts were subjected to controlled drying at 40 °C for 26 h, with acoustic recordings and physical measurements collected every two hours. Acoustic signals were processed using Wavelet Soft Threshold Denoising (WSTD), Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT), and Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), and features were extracted from the resulting signals. Predictive models included generalized linear models (GLM), random forests (RF), gradient boosting machines (GBM), and Partial Least Squares (PLS) approaches. Following grouped walnut-level validation, the highest MC prediction performance was achieved by the model combining dimensional and acoustic descriptors (RF:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.