ArticlePolymers2026
Finite Element Investigation of the Influence of Strut Diameter on the Mechanical Performance of Balloon-Expandable Biodegradable PLA/PDO Coronary Stents.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study numerically investigates the influence of strut diameter on the deployment behavior of a balloon-expandable biodegradable stent with rhombic cell architecture using finite element analysis. The stent material was represented by a 60/40 poly(lactic acid)/polydioxanone (PLA/PDO) blend. Four stent configurations with strut diameters of 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, and 0.50 mm were analyzed under identical deployment conditions. The numerical evaluation considered von Mises stress together with five deployment indicators: diametral strain, elastic recoil, dog-boning, foreshortening, and longitudinal retraction. The results show that increasing the strut diameter reduces elastic recoil, foreshortening, and longitudinal retraction, thereby enhancing post deployment dimensional stability. However, thicker struts also increase the dog-boning effect, indicating less uniform radial expansion. Among the investigated designs, the stent with a 0.35 mm strut diameter showed a balanced response between deployment uniformity and post deployment mechanical stability under the adopted numerical assumptions. For this configuration, elastic recoil, foreshortening, longitudinal retraction, and dog-boning were approximately 6.2%, 10%, 37%, and 8.9%, respectively. These findings provide practical design guidance for biodegradable polymeric vascular stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.